Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Room for Debate: There Goes the Neighborhood

Written By Unknown on Senin, 14 April 2014 | 13.26

Gentrification "has become shorthand for an urban neighborhood where muggings are down and espresso is roasted," wrote Times reporter Andrea Elliot. A Salon piece described it as the result of "sweetheart deals" between the public and private sectors "that never pay off for the public." And don't even mention the word around Spike Lee.

However one might feel about the topic, most everyone would agree that the process benefits the wealthy more than the poor, and tends to erase socioeconomic diversity. Are there ways to curb its effects?

Read the Discussion »
13.26 | 0 komentar | Read More

Opinionator | Bedside: Providing the Balm of Truth

Written By Unknown on Minggu, 13 April 2014 | 13.25

Bedside is a series about health care from a nurse's-eye view.

"What if we gave her some aloe vera gel?"

The question was from a thin woman, and though her query came out of desperation, her face was pinched with fury. She was a relative of the patient in the room, a young woman who was dying of an infection.

That's where gel, which the relative embraced as an herbal remedy, came in. It fell to me, the nurse, to explain why aloe vera could not cure the infection, could not save this patient's life. But what I was really doing was something we often fail to do in hospitals: facing the anger and fear that accompany impending death.

It's not easy to talk about death. President Obama acknowledged this reluctance when he tried to include reimbursement for end-of-life conversations in the Affordable Care Act. The conservatives' ease at recasting such efforts as government "death panels" shows how hard the topic of death is for many people.

There is a point of breakdown at which a body will irrevocably fail. In health care we understand that in terms of physiological details. What's hard for all of us is accepting the painful truth that people die.

The patient in this case had received a stem cell transplant from a matched donor to treat her cancer. She had been taking immune suppressants to keep the donated cells from attacking her own body. The challenge is that such patients are susceptible to infections that wouldn't trouble healthy people. That's what happened with this patient. She contracted a fungal infection, and despite our best efforts at treatment, it got into her brain.

For several weeks she had been asking for all curative treatment to stop, but her doctors kept saying it was too soon. At the point where I was assigned to her, the doctors had finally agreed that nothing more could be done to save her life. As a result of that decision the extended family had gathered to say goodbye. That was the group I walked in on when I took over the patient's care in the afternoon.

The relatives from far away had not seen the patient's sad and slow decline. They were not prepared to say goodbye, and they were angry. The doctors had given up on her, they said. Her husband wanted her to die. No one was trying hard enough to find the one thing that could save her. Maybe aloe vera gel would be the silver bullet.

I had been this patient's nurse often in the past, but not recently, so I didn't have solid answers for them. "Wait," I finally said as the questions came fast and furious, "I'm not putting you off. I need to read her chart so that I can accurately tell you what you want to know. I will come back."

I was lucky; I had time to sit down and make sense of the patient's treatment history, even though there wasn't a lot of sense-making to be done. Roughly 30 percent of patients are dead within a year of such stem cell transplants, and this patient fell within that group.

You can't tell a family only that, though, because there's no balm in it. And by balm I mean empathy for just how terrible it is for someone known and loved to die.

I went back to the room and again was lucky to have the time to really talk with the angry relatives. I told them the story of this young woman's cancer treatment, how she got high doses of chemotherapy to kill her cancer and the infusion of stem cells afterward essentially gave her a new immune system. I talked about immune suppression creating vulnerabilities to odd illnesses, like fungal infections. I told them the patient herself had been asking to go into hospice care long before her doctors assented.

I said that a body can get too broken to be repaired and, despite all our drugs and scans and cutting-edge procedures, sometimes we just can't fix someone, even if we ourselves helped create the problem that is killing her.

The aloe vera gel came up again, and I said it probably wouldn't hurt. The thin woman, now in the chair, her legs tightly crossed in front of her, waved my suggestion away with a quick flip of her wrist and I realized that the relatives weren't really intent on giving the patient aloe vera; what they needed was for someone in the hospital to understand how much they wanted this young woman to live, how desperate they were to reverse fate.

We can call this denial, hubris, fighting until the bitter end. But why not call it what it is? Being human and fearing death, the family could not, in the words of Dylan Thomas, stop raging against the dying of the light.

We read that famous poem as an exhortation: "Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night." I wonder if it is instead a reckoning of how very difficult it is to let life go; the poem was, after all, written about Thomas's own father. "Wise men at their end know dark is right," the poem tells us, but they and "good men," "wild men," "grave men" do not go gentle, because death inevitably brings regret for what might have been, what now will never be.

The idea that compensation be given for discussions about patients' health care choices at the end of their lives targeted this existential knot. It takes time to untangle the threads surrounding death — guilt, fear, anger and love — but it's work that needs to be done, by nurses and doctors, following the patient's preferences and physical reality. Because no matter how much we hate it, death will come.

I've seen a fair number of people die, and the truth is, some go gentle into that good night, but many do not, regardless of their intentions. For my patient it was the same. Her mind seemed to have acquiesced weeks before, but her body, so fragile and battered by disease, hadn't. A good friend of mine was her nurse the day she died. "I need to talk to you," she told me soon after the patient's passing. So long in coming and impossible to reverse, the end itself had been bloody, even gruesome. It was a hard memory for my friend, a seasoned oncology nurse, to bear alone.

I've never forgotten that afternoon in the hospital. Outside, day turned to dusk and then evening. The patient occasionally moaned, but was mostly silent. The thin woman in the chair was still angry, but as dark filled the windows outside the frustration in the room sublimated into a dull acceptance. We did not go gently into that good night, but we went, nonetheless.

Theresa Brown is an oncology nurse and the author of "Critical Care: A New Nurse Faces Death, Life, and Everything in Between."

A version of this article appears in print on 04/13/2014, on page SR8 of the NewYork edition with the headline: Providing the Balm of Truth.

13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Opinionator | Private Lives: Parenting the Non-Girlie Girl

Written By Unknown on Kamis, 10 April 2014 | 13.25

Private Lives: Personal essays on the news of the world and the news of our lives.

There are many possible explanations for why my 5-year-old daughter has yet again asked if she can change her name to Sam. Sam can also be a girl's name, I explain hopefully. No, she clarifies, sighing at the dullard she has been given for a mother. She wants to be Sam the boy's name.

"What's wrong with being a girl?" I ask. My daughter responds that girls like princesses and fairies, and things that are pretty. She is not interested in those things. She is interested in Super Mario (something she's heard about at school and doesn't fully understand) and "Star Wars."

I have consciously not forced pink things or dresses on her because I happen to be a woman who doesn't particularly care for pink or for dresses. When my daughter was a toddler I observed a friend's 3-year-old taking a pretend makeup kit out of a plush purse and applying fake lipstick. "I don't know where this comes from," her mother shrugged. "I don't even wear makeup." I immediately went home and read "Cinderella Ate My Daughter: Dispatches from the Front Lines of the New Girlie-Girl Culture." I've been waiting ever since for the princess phase, assuming it would engulf my daughter regardless of what precautions I took. Now I think I should have been preparing for something else.

When my daughter turned 5, my mother took her to see "Cinderella" on Broadway. She came home with a Cinderella doll and a CD which she played obsessively while dancing with the doll. "Are you Cinderella?" I asked, loathing myself for hoping she'd say yes. "No," she said, rolling her eyes. "I'm the prince dancing with Cinderella."

I try to come up with reasons that being a girl is good. An image of those women in romantic comedies who hang out with "the girls" and cry into their chardonnay comes to mind. But I don't know any women who are actually like that. So I point out that you can get to be a mother, which is the most amazing experience in the world. "Don't you want to be a mama?" I ask my daughter. She starts to cry. "No," she says. "I want to be a pilot."

I feel a pang of failure. How is it possible that, despite the fact that I have held a job for my daughter's entire life, I have somehow failed to convey that one can be both a mama and a pilot?

On the bright side, I have accidentally achieved what many mothers strive for: a non-girlie girl. The other mothers in my Facebook feed share posts from A Mighty Girl ("For smart, confident and courageous girls") and Amy Poehler's Smart Girls ("Change the world by being yourself"). This was the kind of mother I'd planned on being. I'd anticipated conversations about why there were more important things in the world than being beautiful or having a tiara. But these conversations never even come up. I purchase the book "Rosie Revere, Engineer" in an effort to show my daughter that you don't have to be a boy to invent things or have a job. We read it a few times but she doesn't like it because Rosie wears a dress.

On Halloween a parent pulls me aside and tells me how much she loves the fact that my daughter is dressed like a pirate. She is a boy pirate, of course, with pants and a fake beard and a sword. I don't tell this mother that my daughter is a pirate only because she decided at the last minute not to be Darth Vader. Girls who dress as pirates are spunky, mighty girls. Girls who dress as Darth Vader make the other parents uncomfortable.

Perhaps I'm avoiding the obvious: that my daughter is transgender. One day she tells me that, in her next life, she wants to be a boy. I ignore the fact that she has chosen to believe in reincarnation and ask her, "Do you feel like a boy?"

"Of course not," she says. "I'm a girl." Then she says: "But I wish my name were Charlie."

Charlie is the brother of her best friend at school, who, of course, is a boy. This gets me wondering about a different possibility.

For the second year in a row, my daughter is one of a handful of girls in a class dominated by little boys. And in what seems to me like a pretty girlie impulse, my daughter wants to dress like her friends. This means her favorite color right now is plaid, and her outfits consist primarily of T-shirts layered under flannel hand-me-down shirts from her older brother. "This is just like Emmett's shirt," she says as she buttons up a red and white flannel shirt over a blue striped T-shirt. Emmett, who as a 4-year-old boy probably doesn't pay the slightest bit of attention to his wardrobe, is the Vogue magazine of my daughter's life.

When I ask her if she would like to wear her glow-in-the-dark space shuttle necklace, she contemplates it and then says she'll wear it over the weekend. I pull a rumpled skirt from her drawer and ask why she never wears it to school. She says she'll wear it on a day she doesn't have school. Is she afraid Emmett won't play with her if she looks too much like a girl? Is peer pressure causing my daughter to slavishly dress like a boy? Perhaps she isn't such a Mighty Girl after all. Maybe she's just as vulnerable as the girls dragging Snow White dresses to school.

Back when my daughter was on the far edge of 3 she went through a combination pink/Hello Kitty phase. It was so brief I wouldn't even remember it save for the wake of pink detritus it left scattered throughout the house: a soft pink duvet cover in her room, a now-ragged lunch box with a picture of the ever-placid Hello Kitty in a tulle tutu. The Internet says that my daughter's desire to be called Sam is probably not a big deal. Renowned experts say that gender identity is fluid and still forming at this age. My daughter seems pretty sure of herself, but maybe that, too, is just a phase. And ultimately, no matter how many theories I come up with about the motivation behind her decisions, she is going to be who she's going to be, and I will love her the same.

For her birthday she asks for a new duvet cover, to replace the pink one. After much Googling we settle on a blue, green, yellow and white striped cover. The day it arrives she bounces on her little toes, strokes the cover and says she can't wait to go to sleep that night to try it out. As I fold up the old pink cover she asks what I will do with it. "I don't know," I tell her. Maybe a girlie girl somewhere will want it. "Let's save it," my daughter says. "For when I like pink again."


Hana Schank is the author of "A More Perfect Union: How I Survived the Happiest Day of My Life" and a consultant on website usability.


13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Room for Debate: China's Coming Economic Crisis?

Written By Unknown on Rabu, 09 April 2014 | 13.25

  • Loren Brandt

    Costs, but Not Crisis

    Loren Brandt, economist, University of Toronto

    Continued financial repression and the fiscal well-being of the central government will help to avert a Lehman-like crisis.

  • Ann Lee

    China Knows What It's Doing

    Ann Lee, author, "What the U.S. Can Learn From China"

    Should the economic situation deteriorate appreciably, the Chinese authorities have plenty of room to maneuver and stop the hemorrhage.

  • Yasheng Huang

    Bad Management Will Catch Up With China

    Yasheng Huang, author, "Capitalism With Chinese Characteristics"

    China may resemble Japan in how its bad debt will eventually get resolved. But the truth is, bad debt leads to crises or slowdowns.

  • Albert Park

    No Need to Declare Calamity

    Albert Park, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

    Any sign of slowdown in China is greeted with headline-grabbing proclamations of impending financial collapse. And each time, nothing even close to collapse has occurred.

  • Karl Gerth

    Be Careful What You Wish For

    Karl Gerth, author, "As China Goes, so Goes the World"

    While rooting for the rise of the Chinese consumer, we may also want to contemplate the consequences.

  • C. Cindy Fan

    Chinese Citizens Have Their Eyes on the Bubble

    C. Cindy Fan, author, "China on the Move"

    Beijing makes incremental and frequent changes, gradually. Chinese citizens are good at devising strategies to deal with those changes.


  • 13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Taking Note: The Unintended Consequences of Treating College Athletes Like Employees

    Written By Unknown on Selasa, 08 April 2014 | 13.25

    The head of an institution with a vested interest in maintaining the current college sports business model is unhappy about recent attempts to change it. Who could have predicted such a thing?

    In late March a regional director of the National Labor Relations Board ruled that scholarship football players at Northwestern are employees and are therefore eligible to form a union. Northwestern immediately said it would appeal the decision, and at a press conference on Sunday the president of the National Collegiate Athletic Association, Mark Emmert, described unionization as an almost existential threat.

    "To be perfectly frank, the notion of using a union employee model to address the challenges that do exist in intercollegiate athletics is something that strikes most people as a grossly inappropriate solution to the problems," he said. "It would blow up everything about the collegiate model of athletics."

    Later he added: "There's some things that need to get fixed. They're working very aggressively to do that. No one up here believes that the way you fix that is by converting student-athletes into unionized employees."

    At least he admitted that there are "problems." But the notion that colleges are "working very aggressively" to fix them is debatable. (The Division I board of directors will vote this summer on a plan to give the five largest conferences more autonomy and may adjust rules dealing with scholarship renewal and contact with agents, among other matters.) And his scolding tone was galling. The N.L.R.B. did not "convert" Northwestern players into unionized employees — it recognized that they effectively were employees.

    Unionization may not, indeed, be the most elegant response to the exploitation of college athletes. As the general counsel of the American Council on Education, Ada Meloy, wrote in a letter to The Times, "applying the legal label of 'employees' to tens of thousands of student-athletes opens the door to many troubling questions, and few good answers."

    There may be unintended consequences; but let's keep in mind that unionization is itself the unintended consequence of colleges requiring "amateurs" to train and compete like professionals, and making money — in some cases, a whole lot of money — off of their labor. That fact, and not unionization, is what deserves to be called "grossly inappropriate."


    13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Are Court Stenographers Necessary?

  • Nancy Varallo

    There Is No Substitute

    Nancy Varallo, National Court Reporters Association

    Court reporters can now filter their shorthand through computers to provide judges, attorneys and clients with instantaneous, understandable transcripts.

  • Richard G. Kopf

    Technology Creates an Accessible Record

    Richard G. Kopf, Federal judge

    Digital recordings of hearings can be uploaded to federal court servers where anyone, anywhere, will be able to listen.

  • Peter A. Cahill

    During Trials, Recordings Are a Safety Net

    Peter A. Cahill, district court judge in Minneapolis

    A digital audio system can record throughout the day in all courtrooms, acting as a safety net if a stenographic court reporter falls.

  • Brian Green

    Recording Cuts Costs for Taxpayers

    Brian Green, Jefferson Audio Video Systems, Inc., in Louisville, Ky.

    Why have an annual salary assigned to a function that a digital recording system can do at a fraction of the cost?

  • Stuart M. Auslander

    The Human Touch Is Superior

    Stuart M. Auslander, New York School of Court Reporting

    Court reporters can discern external noise, difficult accents, and simultaneous talking. They also produce closed captioning, which helps the hearing-impaired.


  • 13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Opinionator | The Great Divide: Capitalize Workers!

    Written By Unknown on Minggu, 06 April 2014 | 13.25

    The Great Divide is a series about inequality.

    Raising the minimum wage has justifiably captured policy makers' attention, but if the goal is to materially raise living standards for every American worker, we should also be calling for a minimum pension. Done right, this would not only create real wealth for the middle and working classes, it would use the power of financial markets to reduce wealth disparity instead of widening it.

    There is a vast difference in the way the wealthy and the rest of Americans earn their money. In 2010, 60 cents of every dollar earned by those in the top 1 percent came from investments and businesses they owned. For the middle class, it was 6 cents.

    For decades, the returns to capital have far outstripped the returns to labor. Before the mid-1980s, worker salaries constituted 65 percent of national income. In 2012, they were 58 percent. Economists rightly fret over how this contributes to wealth inequality. Well, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. If all working people, whatever their wage, could get a piece of these gains, it would improve their financial well-being exponentially. This is where the minimum pension comes in.

    We are proposing a Savings Plan for Universal Retirement account, the centerpiece of which is a 50-cent-per-hour minimum retirement contribution from all employers to virtually all employees. This is not what President George W. Bush proposed when he sought to privatize Social Security in 2005. Under our plan, Social Security remains as is, but every worker would also have his or her own private Individual Retirement Account, the way many white-collar workers do now.

    Contributions placed in this account would automatically go into a privately run low-fee life-cycle fund. (Life-cycle funds comprise a mix of stock and bond investments tailored to how far the owner is from retirement.) Recipients could switch investment options to say, an S&P 500 index fund. A government board like the one that now manages the retirement accounts of federal employees would sanction the investment options.

    This policy isn't meant to replace current pension plans; employers that still provide retirement benefits would satisfy the new requirement. It is geared to individuals who are not saving in the existing system. And it would be completely portable, like a cellphone number.

    A 50-cent minimum pension (adjusted for inflation) would amount to a minimum yearly employer contribution of roughly $1,000 for each full-time worker. It would improve retirement security for the 47 percent of these workers who are not currently contributing to any employer-sponsored retirement plan. Contributions would begin early on so even small amounts would have decades to grow.

    How much? If stocks and bonds enjoy the same average rates of return as they did over the last 45 years, someone who begins earning income at age 22, receives only the minimum contribution each year, and retires at age 67 would have a balance of approximately $160,000, in 2013 dollars. By contrast, the median couple — not individual — approaching retirement today has only $42,000 in private retirement accounts. Of course, past gains are no guarantee, but over the long term investments in diversified stock and bond funds have usually paid off. And since this is on top of Social Security, a certain amount of risk is acceptable.

    The biggest winners would be minorities, who have high labor participation rates but lag far behind whites in retirement savings. Only 34 percent of working-age Latinos and 51 percent of African-Americans with full-time jobs participate in employer-sponsored retirement plans, compared with 59 percent for whites, who also contribute more to these plans.

    Individuals would be able to match or exceed employer contributions (and employers could contribute additional amounts, as some do now). For those at the lower end of the income spectrum, up to half of their contributions could be reimbursed by the Savers Credit, an underused government savings incentive that became law in 2001. Simply matching the contribution yourself would increase your expected account balance at retirement to more than $300,000. This nest egg could not be raided or borrowed against, and in retirement would automatically convert to an annuity, unless you chose otherwise. So we would never outlive our savings. A $160,000 account would amount to a $790 monthly annuity.

    How would this affect businesses? The 50-cent minimum contribution is only one-sixth of the proposed increase to the minimum wage. And Congress could make a number of small changes in the tax code to make this palatable to employers.

    Being dependent only on wages is, unfortunately, no longer enough. A minimum pension would create a chain of wealth for everyone who works and it would allow ordinary Americans to benefit from the expansion of the world economy rather than being at the mercy of it.

    Jonathan Cowan is the president and Jim Kessler is the vice president for policy at Third Way, a centrist policy institute.

    A version of this article appears in print on 04/06/2014, on page SR7 of the National edition with the headline: Capitalize Workers!.

    13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Television Tests Tinseltown

    Written By Unknown on Jumat, 04 April 2014 | 13.25

    Introduction

    DESCRIPTIONJon Hamm plays the character Don Draper in AMC's cinematic and successful television series "Mad Men."
    Michael Yarish/AMC

    Television is in a new golden age, with many A-list directors, writers and actors choosing series over films, and water cooler chat ignoring Oscar contenders to discuss shows like "Mad Men," which will soon begin its final season. Meanwhile streaming entertainment creates more obstacles for studio-produced movies while making the $15 theater ticket look more and more like a losing proposition.

    Is going to the movies passé? How can filmmakers compete better with television or showcase what makes them unique?

    Read the Discussion »
    13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Tax the Childless to Help Parents?

    Written By Unknown on Kamis, 03 April 2014 | 13.25

    "The willingness of parents to bear and nurture children saves us from becoming an economically moribund nation of hateful curmudgeons," Reihan Salam wrote recently in Slate. "The least we can do is offer them a bigger tax break." Childless taxpayers like himself should pay more, he said. He suggested lowering the threshold at which higher tax rates kick in, and then giving parents a new $2,500 per child credit that's included in a Republican bill in the House.

    Does it make sense for people without children to subsidize tax breaks for those bearing the costs of being parents?

    Read the Discussion »
    13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Global Warming and the Developing World

    Written By Unknown on Rabu, 02 April 2014 | 13.25

    Climate change is drastically affecting the whole world and is likely to become much more damaging unless greenhouse gases are reduced, recent reports from the United Nations and the the American Association for the Advancement of Science have concluded. The problems are most immediate in developing nations, many of which have contributed little pollution but are most affected by rising sea levels and drought.

    While experts say all nations will be harmed by global warming and all need to take more serious measures, what should be done to deal with the most threatening effects of climate change in developing countries?

    Read the Discussion »
    13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More
    techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger