The Justice Department recently signaled that it may be taking on a greater role in assuring the quality of indigent defense in state criminal systems. It filed a brief last month in a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington against two towns for failing to provide adequate legal assistance for poor defendants.
The department's filing, reported by NPR, did not take a position on the merits of the plaintiffs' claim, but it starkly described what Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. has called the "state of crisis" in public defender systems nationwide. If the Washington plaintiffs prevail, the government's brief said, the court should appoint an independent monitor to help ensure that the two towns provide all defendants with effective counsel, a constitutionally protected right.
Mr. Holder has talked often about indigent defense, but because systemic problems traditionally have been dealt with at the state level, the federal government has maintained a limited role. That may be changing. State public defenders represent the vast majority of criminal defendants across the country, but, as the brief explained, they remain at a "staggering disadvantage" because of the resources that go to law enforcement and prosecutors' offices.
The disadvantage may be nowhere more glaring than in New Orleans, where indigent people sit in jail uncharged, sometimes for months, waiting for a lawyer whose workload far exceeds any reasonable standard. Professional guidelines recommend that public defenders handle no more than 400 misdemeanor cases in a year, yet a 2009 report found that part-time public defenders in Orleans Parish handled the equivalent of 19,000 misdemeanor cases per attorney annually — which means an average of about seven minutes spent by a lawyer on each case.
This terrible system is hobbled by a perverse funding mechanism. Traffic fines and court fees paid by defendants who are convicted or plead guilty account for nearly half of the annual budget of the Orleans Public Defenders Office. This is an unpredictable revenue stream, and it may also pose a conflict of interest since public defenders end up representing many defendants whose fines support their salaries.
The lack of funding was so severe that Louisiana state lawmakers responded in part by raising the fine for seat belt violations in New Orleans by $20, to $45 for a first-time offense. A more sustainable solution might be to reclassify lower-level offenses as infractions that do not involve jail time and therefore would not require legal counsel.
Some money for the defenders comes from city and state appropriations, though far more is appropriated to law enforcement and prosecutors. Each year, New Orleans residents pay $367 per capita for the police and less than $2 per capita for public defense, which is completely inadequate in a city where public defenders represent more than 80 percent of all criminal defendants.
Fifty years after the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution guarantees every criminal defendant a lawyer, the right to effective counsel remains an empty promise in too many parts of the country. The Justice Department's filing in the Washington lawsuit is an encouraging sign that the federal government is beginning to back up that promise with the weight of its authority.
Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang
Editorial: Federal Oversight on Public Defense
Dengan url
http://opinimasyarakota.blogspot.com/2013/09/editorial-federal-oversight-on-public.html
Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya
Editorial: Federal Oversight on Public Defense
namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link
Editorial: Federal Oversight on Public Defense
sebagai sumbernya
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar