Letter: Syria and the U.N.

Connect With Us on Twitter

For Op-Ed, follow @nytopinion and to hear from the editorial page editor, Andrew Rosenthal, follow @andyrNYT.

To the Editor:

Nader Mousavizadeh's excellent analysis of the disastrous Syrian dilemma ("For the U.N., Syria Is Both Promise and Peril," Op-Ed, nytimes.com, Sept. 26) doesn't address two critical problems.

First, while I fully agree that the June 2012 Geneva Communiqué, negotiated by Kofi Annan, the former United Nations secretary general, is still the only viable framework that exists today for a peace process, how on earth does Mr. Mousavizadeh propose to bring the divided and disorganized opposition to the table in one coherent, cohesive delegation?

And second, who will pay the "real and lasting price ... for the regime's use of chemical weapons," and how and when?

AHMAD FAWZI
The Hague, Sept. 27, 2013

The writer is the former communication adviser and spokesman for the Joint United Nations-Arab League special envoys for Syria.

Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang

Letter: Syria and the U.N.

Dengan url

http://opinimasyarakota.blogspot.com/2013/10/letter-syria-and-un.html

Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya

Letter: Syria and the U.N.

namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link

Letter: Syria and the U.N.

sebagai sumbernya