When an appeals court removed the judge from the stop-and-frisk case in New York, the panel accused her of several indiscretions: commenting out of court on a pending case, inappropriately steering cases to her court and encouraging a potential plaintiff to sue.
The accusations raise questions about what it means to be impartial, and to appear impartial. What restrictions should be placed on judges?
Read the Discussion »Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang
Room for Debate: The Appearance of Impartiality
Dengan url
http://opinimasyarakota.blogspot.com/2013/11/room-for-debate-appearance-of.html
Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya
Room for Debate: The Appearance of Impartiality
namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link
Room for Debate: The Appearance of Impartiality
sebagai sumbernya
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar