Room for Debate: Should Democracies Have Monarchs?

Written By Unknown on Kamis, 12 Desember 2013 | 13.25

  • Duncan McCargo

    How Thailand Remains in Turmoil

    Duncan McCargo, author, "Tearing Apart the Land"

    Royal interventions in Thai politics are overrated. In reality, monarchical mystique may impede robust representative politics and fuel instability.

  • Omar G. EncarnaciĆ³n

    Spain's King, Eager to Lose Power

    Omar G. EncarnaciĆ³n, author, "Democracy Without Justice in Spain"

    After the Franco dictatorship, the restored monarchy became a pillar of democratization and a unifying force in a divided nation.

  • Vernon Bogdanor

    In Britain, the Crown Has Less Political Baggage

    Vernon Bogdanor, author, "The Monarchy and the Constitution"

    In the U.S., an elected leader struggles to represent the nation as a whole while satisfying partisan supporters. But the queen has only one constituency.

  • Karma Ura

    Bhutan Needs Monarchy, and Democracy

    Karma Ura, Center for Bhutan Studies

    Bhutanese people do not want to lose the stability of the monarchy, but they accepted the king's decision to shift toward democracy.

  • J. Andrew Ross

    God Save the Queen, and the Queen Save Canada

    J. Andrew Ross, historian, University of Guelph

    In the model that Canada (and Thailand) borrowed from the British, the monarch remains key.


  • Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang

    Room for Debate: Should Democracies Have Monarchs?

    Dengan url

    http://opinimasyarakota.blogspot.com/2013/12/room-for-debate-should-democracies-have.html

    Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya

    Room for Debate: Should Democracies Have Monarchs?

    namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link

    Room for Debate: Should Democracies Have Monarchs?

    sebagai sumbernya

    0 komentar:

    Posting Komentar

    techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger