Room for Debate: Are Court Stenographers Necessary?

Written By Unknown on Selasa, 08 April 2014 | 13.25

  • Nancy Varallo

    There Is No Substitute

    Nancy Varallo, National Court Reporters Association

    Court reporters can now filter their shorthand through computers to provide judges, attorneys and clients with instantaneous, understandable transcripts.

  • Richard G. Kopf

    Technology Creates an Accessible Record

    Richard G. Kopf, Federal judge

    Digital recordings of hearings can be uploaded to federal court servers where anyone, anywhere, will be able to listen.

  • Peter A. Cahill

    During Trials, Recordings Are a Safety Net

    Peter A. Cahill, district court judge in Minneapolis

    A digital audio system can record throughout the day in all courtrooms, acting as a safety net if a stenographic court reporter falls.

  • Brian Green

    Recording Cuts Costs for Taxpayers

    Brian Green, Jefferson Audio Video Systems, Inc., in Louisville, Ky.

    Why have an annual salary assigned to a function that a digital recording system can do at a fraction of the cost?

  • Stuart M. Auslander

    The Human Touch Is Superior

    Stuart M. Auslander, New York School of Court Reporting

    Court reporters can discern external noise, difficult accents, and simultaneous talking. They also produce closed captioning, which helps the hearing-impaired.


  • Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang

    Room for Debate: Are Court Stenographers Necessary?

    Dengan url

    http://opinimasyarakota.blogspot.com/2014/04/room-for-debate-are-court-stenographers.html

    Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya

    Room for Debate: Are Court Stenographers Necessary?

    namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link

    Room for Debate: Are Court Stenographers Necessary?

    sebagai sumbernya

    0 komentar:

    Posting Komentar

    techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger