There Is No Substitute
Nancy Varallo, National Court Reporters Association
Court reporters can now filter their shorthand through computers to provide judges, attorneys and clients with instantaneous, understandable transcripts.
Technology Creates an Accessible Record
Richard G. Kopf, Federal judge
Digital recordings of hearings can be uploaded to federal court servers where anyone, anywhere, will be able to listen.
During Trials, Recordings Are a Safety Net
Peter A. Cahill, district court judge in Minneapolis
A digital audio system can record throughout the day in all courtrooms, acting as a safety net if a stenographic court reporter falls.
Recording Cuts Costs for Taxpayers
Brian Green, Jefferson Audio Video Systems, Inc., in Louisville, Ky.
Why have an annual salary assigned to a function that a digital recording system can do at a fraction of the cost?
The Human Touch Is Superior
Stuart M. Auslander, New York School of Court Reporting
Court reporters can discern external noise, difficult accents, and simultaneous talking. They also produce closed captioning, which helps the hearing-impaired.
Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang
Room for Debate: Are Court Stenographers Necessary?
Dengan url
http://opinimasyarakota.blogspot.com/2014/04/room-for-debate-are-court-stenographers.html
Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya
Room for Debate: Are Court Stenographers Necessary?
namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link
Room for Debate: Are Court Stenographers Necessary?
sebagai sumbernya
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar