Go Back to the Basics
Diane Ravitch, author, "Reign of Error"
The original purpose of the 1965 law was to distribute federal aid to schools and districts that enrolled large numbers of poor children.
The Law Has Provided Useful Data
Terrell Halaska, former assistant secretary of education under George W. Bush
Now Congress needs to rebalance the federal-state relationship, and give states more flexibility on education and parents and educators more choice.
It's More Than Math and Literacy
Randi Weingarten, American Federation of Teachers
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act need to return to its roots to focus on poverty, equity, funding, the joy of learning and the whole child.
Federal Oversight of Schools Is Vital
Wade Henderson, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Critics who claim the annual assessments, reporting and accountability have been failures aren't paying attention to the vast improvements.
Better and More Diverse Assessments
Stephen Lazar, high school teacher
Because of misguided incentives in the education law, too many schools are designed to get students to do well on a one-time test.
Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang
Room for Debate: What Would It Mean to 'Fix' No Child Left Behind?
Dengan url
http://opinimasyarakota.blogspot.com/2015/02/room-for-debate-what-would-it-mean-to.html
Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya
Room for Debate: What Would It Mean to 'Fix' No Child Left Behind?
namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link
Room for Debate: What Would It Mean to 'Fix' No Child Left Behind?
sebagai sumbernya
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar