Room for Debate: What Would It Mean to 'Fix' No Child Left Behind?

Written By Unknown on Rabu, 04 Februari 2015 | 13.25

  • Diane Ravitch

    Go Back to the Basics

    Diane Ravitch, author, "Reign of Error"

    The original purpose of the 1965 law was to distribute federal aid to schools and districts that enrolled large numbers of poor children.

  • Terrell Halaska

    The Law Has Provided Useful Data

    Terrell Halaska, former assistant secretary of education under George W. Bush

    Now Congress needs to rebalance the federal-state relationship, and give states more flexibility on education and parents and educators more choice.

  • Randi Weingarten

    It's More Than Math and Literacy

    Randi Weingarten, American Federation of Teachers

    The Elementary and Secondary Education Act need to return to its roots to focus on poverty, equity, funding, the joy of learning and the whole child.

  • Wade Henderson

    Federal Oversight of Schools Is Vital

    Wade Henderson, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights

    Critics who claim the annual assessments, reporting and accountability have been failures aren't paying attention to the vast improvements.

  • Stephen Lazar

    Better and More Diverse Assessments

    Stephen Lazar, high school teacher

    Because of misguided incentives in the education law, too many schools are designed to get students to do well on a one-time test.


  • Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang

    Room for Debate: What Would It Mean to 'Fix' No Child Left Behind?

    Dengan url

    http://opinimasyarakota.blogspot.com/2015/02/room-for-debate-what-would-it-mean-to.html

    Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya

    Room for Debate: What Would It Mean to 'Fix' No Child Left Behind?

    namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link

    Room for Debate: What Would It Mean to 'Fix' No Child Left Behind?

    sebagai sumbernya

    0 komentar:

    Posting Komentar

    techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger