Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Taking Note: Removing Cuba From the List of Terror Sponsors, Finally

Written By Unknown on Kamis, 16 April 2015 | 13.25

Photo A vendor in Havana.Credit Alejandro Ernesto/European Pressphoto Agency

There were a couple of questions American officials struggled to answer substantively when they announced on Tuesday that the White House has decided to remove Cuba from the list of nations that sponsor terrorism.

For starters, what took so long?

"There is no periodic review of state sponsors of terrorism," an administration official said during a conference call with reporters conducted on condition of anonymity. "It's not something we undertake on a regularized basis."

They also were unable to say when Cuba, which has been on the list since 1982, stopped sponsoring terrorist organizations.

"The evaluation of whether a state sponsors terrorism is not based simply on an act of terrorism," an official said, dodging the question. "It is sustained support for international terrorism."

American officials have cited Cuba's past support for ETA, a Basque separatist group that is no longer operational, and Colombian guerrilla groups, as justification to keep them on the list. For several years, though, Cuban officials have maintained publicly and emphatically that they don't condone or support acts of terror. In recent years, Cuba has hosted peace talks between the Colombian government and the country's largest guerrilla group.

Removing Cuba from the list represents an important step toward normalizing relations between Havana and Washington. Barring congressional intervention, which seems unlikely, Cuba will be removed from the list within 45 days. That will allow the White House to formally eliminate one set of economic sanctions imposed on the island.

That would leave only Sudan, Iran and Syria on the list. The step is welcome, if overdue. Designations that subject countries to economic sanctions ought to be reviewed periodically and carefully. Keeping Cuba on the list for years without due cause allowed Havana to portray itself as a victim and Washington as a bully.

Closing that chapter will make it easier for American and Cuban officials to open a dialogue about human rights and personal freedoms, two areas where the Cuban government is richly deserving of criticism.


13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Editorial: Total Failure on Speedy Trials in New York

Photo View from a cell at Rikers Island. Credit Seth Wenig/Associated Press

The outrageous delays in New York City's criminal justice system were given a human face last year, when Jennifer Gonnerman, writing in The New Yorker, introduced readers to Kalief Browder, who was 16 when he was arrested in 2010 for a robbery he says he did not commit.

He was held for three years without trial on Rikers Island before the case was dismissed. His court dates were changed again and again and again while he was in jail. Over the years, he was battered by guards, sent to solitary confinement and eventually tried to hang himself.

Throughout the hugely inefficient system, delays are routine — caused by everything from scheduling conflicts among prosecutors and defense lawyers to failure of witnesses to show up and too few judges to hear cases.

Mayor Bill de Blasio spoke apologetically of Mr. Browder's case this week when he and the state's chief judge, Jonathan Lippman, unveiled a plan that is intended to shorten court delays, cut the jail population and prevent people from being held, sometimes for years, without trial. As of last month, more than 400 people at Rikers had been locked up for more than two years without being convicted of a crime, according to a report on Tuesday in The Times by Michael Schwirtz and Michael Winerip.

The plan can succeed only if judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, corrections officials and other participants in the justice system stop blaming one another for court delays and work closely together to do away with them.

The justice system plan announced this week by Mr. de Blasio and Judge Lippmann calls for judges to prioritize the cases of the 1,500 or so people who have been held for more than a year without being convicted. The goal is to resolve half of those cases within six months. Cases that cannot be disposed of by plea bargain will be assigned a fixed trial date.

For this to work, corrections officials need to get inmates to court at the appointed time and police officers need to show up in court on time. Instead of seeking adjournments and delays, defense attorneys and prosecutors must be prepared and ready to proceed.

Judges who now permit too many unjustified adjournments will need to change the way they run their courtrooms.

Under the plan, each borough will have a dedicated team, led by the county's administrative judge, that will work with operations experts to figure out the causes of court delays. The teams — which will include members from City Hall, the district attorneys' offices, the defense bar and the police — will also monitor progress made on old cases and develop reforms that shorten processing times.

These teams may need to recommend changes to court hours in some places, and should seriously consider putting courtrooms on Rikers Island itself. A separate citywide body will be responsible for putting recommendations into action.

Meanwhile, too many poor defendants can end up waiting in jail for months because they cannot afford bail. State lawmakers could help by changing the bail system and creating a presumption of release for low-level offenders who present no risk to the public. A bill pending in the Legislature, and introduced by Judge Lippman, would address this problem.

13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Taking Note: The Retro Futurism of Marco Rubio

Photo Senator Marco Rubio with his wife, Jeanette, and their four children.Credit Wilfredo Lee/Associated Press

Marco Rubio announced his presidential campaign on Monday evening in Miami, in a speech that was supposed to be all about the future, about the 21st century, about the triumph of young energy over old ideas.

In other words, as they said back in 1992, Bill Clinton's day: Don't stop thinking about tomorrow. Don't stop – it'll soon be here!

Yes, it will. But will it be better than before? Mr. Rubio insisted that it would, with a disdainful remark about his elder rival Hillary Clinton: "Just yesterday, a leader from yesterday began a campaign for president by promising to take us back to yesterday. But yesterday is over, and we are never going back."

While he was saying that I was looking over Mr. Rubio's shoulder, at his campaign logo. "Marco Rubio: A New American Century" has a 48-state map of the United States dotting the "i" in "Rubio." It's too bad for Alaska and Hawaii, but that's the map you have to use if you're going to turn the country into a graphic element.

It's the map from 1958, which, on reflection, seems to be pretty close to the era on which Mr. Rubio, for all his talk about looking forward, was trying to pin the country's hopes and dreams.

His speech was mostly an anthology of Republican applause lines – pro-God and liberty, anti-tax and anti-Obama — grafted onto a gauzy recollection of his family's story and his humble roots as the son of a bartender and maid. When he talked about a country that "no longer graduates students with mountains of debt and degrees that do not lead to jobs, and that graduates more students from high school ready to work" – that was definitely the late '50s he was summoning. It was the time when women's reproductive rights were not protected, when universal health care was a liberal fantasy, and when nobody, but nobody, thought of "being passive in the face of Chinese and Russian aggression."

There was more in that vein, but, to be fair, it was just one speech with an unfortunately faulty theme. (Not as flawed as Senator Ted Cruz's campaign announcement, where he oddly and endlessly channeled John Lennon.) Mr. Rubio looked young and nervous, as if he were running for high school class president, and seemed utterly relieved to get to the end, when he could do the (very, very dated) political ritual of the song-plus-the-wife-and-kids-waving-at the-crowd, with everything but the balloons.

Mr. Rubio gave a canned speech, trying, with the canny desperation of an ad campaign from the "Mad Men" era, to inject some freshness into a tired, wrinkly G.O.P. brand. For that he deserves some credit, at least. He does not seem driven by an unseen madness, as many in his party are. And he has been courageous before, when he helped to draft a sensible immigration law that enraged his party's nativists. Mr. Rubio has spent years trying to live that down, to deny that he was once smart, thoughtful and sensible on immigration. In the months to come, on that issue and so many others, Mr. Rubio may be scrambling to find a message that sells and an identity that fits in a party that has lost its mind. Here's hoping that when his head finally stops spinning, it's facing forward again.


13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Taking Note: Harry Reid Jabs His Adversary

Photo Senator Harry Reid.Credit Manuel Balce Ceneta/Associated Press

Senator Harry Reid, the Democratic minority leader, was an amateur boxer in his youth, so he should know about haymakers. He directed one at Senator Mitch McConnell Wednesday when, criticizing the Kentucky Republican's fierce dedication to the coal industry, Mr. Reid concluded, "I don't mean to be mean-spirited, but he is a lump of coal."

There was no immediate comment or comparable name-calling from the courtly Mr. McConnell, the Senate's majority leader. But there seemed a decided air of freedom to Mr. Reid's feistiness now that he has announced plans to make this fifth term his last and exit the Senate next year.

What does he think of the crowded lineup of Republican candidates for President? "You know, I don't really care. I think they're all losers," the senator answered John Harwood of CNBC.

Referring to Mr. Reid's accident during a home workout in which he damaged his sight in one eye, Mr. Harwood told the senator, "In the last few days a bunch of people are saying, 'Reid, he didn't have an exercise accident. He got beaten up by the mob.'"

Mr. Reid easily bobbed away from that one, blaming right-wing radio polemicists. "How could anyone say anything like that?" said Mr. Reid. "I think a lot of people, as I read, they kinda don't like me as a person, and I think that's unfortunate."


13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Op-Ed Columnist: What’s Up With You?

While U.S.-Iran relations are taking up all the oxygen in the room these days, and they're vitally important for the future of the Middle East, U.S.-China relations are vitally important for the world — and there's more going on there than meets the eye. The concept of "one country, two systems" was invented to describe the relationship between Hong Kong and mainland China. But here's the truth: the American and Chinese economies and futures today are now totally intertwined, so much so that they are the real "one country-two systems" to watch. And after recently being in China to attend the big Boao Forum on Hainan Island, and hearing President Xi Jinping speak, what is striking is how much each side in this relationship currently seems to be asking the other, "What's up with you?"

Both countries almost take for granted the ties that bind them today: the $600 billion in annual bilateral trade; the 275,000 Chinese studying in America, and the 25,000 Americans studying in China; the fact that China is now America's largest agricultural market and the largest foreign holder of U.S. debt; and the fact that last year Chinese investment in the United States for the first time exceeded American investment in China.

But dig underneath and you find these two systems increasingly baffled by the other. Chinese officials still have not gotten over their profound shock at how the United States — a country they took as an economic model and the place where many of them learned capitalism — could have become so reckless as to trigger the 2008 global subprime mortgage meltdown, which started the trope in China that America is a superpower in decline.

Chinese officials were also baffled by an effort by President Obama's team to resist China's establishment of an Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, by lobbying our biggest economic allies — South Korea, Australia, France, Germany, Italy and Britain — not to join. While the Treasury secretary, Jack Lew, kept stressing publicly, and responsibly, that the only American concern was that the bank operate by international standards, other Obama officials actively pressed U.S. allies to stay out. Except for Japan, they all snubbed Washington and joined the Chinese-led bank. The whole episode only empowered Beijing hard-liners who argue that the United States just wants to keep China down and can't really accommodate it as a stakeholder.

Americans, though, are asking of President Xi: "What's up with you?" Xi's anti-corruption campaign is clearly aimed at stifling the biggest threat to any one-party system: losing its legitimacy because of rampant corruption. But he also seems to be taking out potential political rivals as well. Xi has assumed more control over the military, economic and political levers of power in China than any leader since Mao. But to what end — to reform or to stay the same?

Xi is "amassing power to maintain the Communist Party's supremacy," argued Willy Wo-Lap Lam, author of "Chinese Politics in the Era of Xi Jinping: Renaissance, Reform or Retrogression?" Xi "believes one reason behind the Soviet Union's collapse is that the party lost control of the army and the economy." But Xi seems to be more focused on how the Soviet Union collapsed than how America succeeded, and that is not good. His crackdown has not only been on corruption, which is freezing a lot of officials from making any big decisions, but on even the mildest forms of dissent. Foreign textbooks used by universities are being censored, and blogging and searching on China's main Internet sites have never been more controlled. Don't even think about using Google there or reading Western newspapers online.

But, at the same time, Xi has begun a huge push for "innovation," for transforming China's economy from manufacturing and assembly to more knowledge-intensive work, so this one-child generation will be able to afford to take care of two retiring parents in a country with an inadequate social-safety net.

Alas, crackdowns don't tend to produce start-ups.

As Antoine van Agtmael, the investor who coined the term "emerging markets," said to me: China is making it harder to innovate in China precisely when rising labor costs in China and rising innovation in America are spurring more companies to build their next plant in the United States, not China. The combination of cheap energy in America and more flexible, open innovation — where universities and start-ups share brainpower with companies to spin off discoveries; where manufacturers use a new generation of robots and 3-D printers that allow more production to go local; and where new products integrate wirelessly connected sensors with new materials to become smarter, faster than ever — is making America, says van Agtmael, "the next great emerging market."

"It's a paradigm shift," he added. "The last 25 years was all about who could make things cheapest, and the next 25 years will be about who can make things smartest."

President Xi seems to be betting that China is big enough and smart enough to curb the Internet and political speech just enough to prevent dissent but not enough to choke off innovation. This is the biggest bet in the world today. And if he's wrong (and color me dubious) we're all going to feel it.

Correction: April 16, 2015

Thomas L. Friedman's column on Wednesday misspelled the location of China's annual Boao Forum on Asia. It is on Hainan Island, not Hainin Island.

13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Opinionator | Disunion: What Lincoln Left Behind

Written By Unknown on Rabu, 15 April 2015 | 13.25

Photo Abraham Lincoln's gloves, stained with his blood.Credit Annie Leibovitz/Contact Press Images from "Pilgrimage"

Disunion follows the Civil War as it unfolded.

John Wilkes Booth shot Abraham Lincoln at Ford's Theater, in Washington, on the evening of April 14, 1865, and within hours, telegrams and newspapers began to deliver the news around the country. As horrible as Lincoln's murder seems to us today, it is hard to fathom just how earth-shattering it was for many people at the time. It was shocking enough that this was the first presidential assassination in American history. But it also came at a moment — less than a week after Gen. Robert E. Lee's surrender at Appomattox — when Americans were either celebrating victory or despairing at defeat.

To Mattie Jackson, a runaway slave, the tidings of Lincoln's death felt like "an electric shock to my soul." Many refused to believe it. "I still think we must be the victims of a gigantic street rumor," a white woman confessed to her mother.

Future disastrous events would bring the disbelieving to radio, television, the telephone and social media, but in the spring of 1865, astounded Americans could confirm reports of catastrophe only by seeking out other human faces.

As soon as Lucy Hedge saw the headlines, she dressed and left her New England home to walk through the streets, where, she wrote later, "gloom and dismay were pictured upon every countenance." In Louisville, Ky., "distress was visible in every colored person's face," said one observer, while in New York, a weeping white man made his way to Wall Street to join "the crowd with sad and horror-stricken faces."

With so many mourners looking into one another's eyes, Lincoln's opponents had to be on guard, for no exhibition of glee among defeated Confederates would be tolerated. In Richmond, Va., the captured Confederate capital that Lincoln had visited a little over a week earlier, "Each man looked sharp at those who passed him," a Northern missionary wrote to his father.

Many Confederates stayed out of sight — but not all. Some dared to clap or cheer in public, and on Bienville Street in New Orleans, a white man taunted grieving African-Americans by pointing to a newspaper headline about the assassination and, one black woman recalled, "poking his tongue out."

Soon, though, came a shift. Whereas the bereaved at first sought confirmation in as many faces as possible, before long their attention was riveted on a single face: that of the murdered president. On April 18 Lincoln lay in state, inside a walnut coffin resting on a towering and lavishly decorated catafalque, in the East Room of the White House. The funeral took place the next day, and the day after that the body again went on display, this time in the Capitol rotunda. Thousands filed by. What better proof of the appalling turns of events?

From the capital, the body of the slain president traveled for two weeks, across nearly 1,700 miles, with elaborate ceremonies in 11 cities. Everywhere visitors were overwhelmed by the "rush and jam" to see the body, as guards kept the congested lines moving so rapidly that "it was impossible," one spectator protested, "to obtain a satisfactory view." Mattie Jackson, for one, knew that she would not be "convinced of his death" until she "gazed upon his remains."

Yet the ritual viewing of Lincoln's body — and his face — proved troublesome. When mourners did catch a glimpse of that singular visage, many were disappointed. To one, "his whiskers being shorn off made his face look small"; to another, "the expression was wanting."

With embalming still a rudimentary science, people felt let down by the physical diminishment that came with decay. By the time Lincoln's body got to Chicago, it seemed to one mourner that he "did not look as they fancied great men did." The lifeless face simply could not live up to visions of the exalted commander in chief. A man who had stepped out of the snaking line in Philadelphia chose instead to "remember Mr. L. as I saw him in Trenton, with that bright smile playing in his face," an image far more memorable than "the set features of a corpse."

Even after Lincoln's burial in his hometown, Springfield, Ill., on May 4, some still could not entirely grasp what had happened. Many turned to artifacts — pasting headlines into scrapbooks, collecting commemorative photographs — in an effort to come to terms with the unfathomable.

Marian Hooper traveled from Boston to Washington in late May, making her way to the boardinghouse across the street from Ford's Theater, to which the fatally wounded president had been carried on the night of April 14, and where he had remained unconscious in a cramped back bedroom until he died the next morning. The blood-soaked pillow, "left just as it was on that night," she wrote home, was "a painful sight, and yet we wanted to see it." And why? Because, she explained, "it makes it so vivid."

As the war had ground to an end, Lincoln's mourners could comfort themselves by believing that their president would guide them through the aftermath of the conflict. Now he was gone. Even as the bereaved yearned for visual evidence to help them absorb the cataclysmic truth, all Americans would long continue to ponder the fate of the nation, and what might have been different, had Lincoln lived.

Martha Hodes is a professor of history at New York University and the author, most recently, of "Mourning Lincoln."


13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Editorial: Justice for Blackwater Victims

Photo Mohammed Hafiz with a photo of his son, who was killed in the Blackwater shooting. Credit Khalid Mohammed/Associated Press

For years, it seemed inconceivable to Iraqis that the American justice system would ever punish the private security contractors who wantonly opened fire in a busy Baghdad traffic circle in September 2007, killing 17 civilians.

Yet, on Monday, a judge in Washington imposed lengthy sentences on four former employees of the notorious security firm then known as Blackwater. These men, who came to embody the American government's often heavy-handed and at times careless conduct during the Iraq war, asked for leniency but were defiant in asserting their innocence. Judge Royce Lamberth of Federal District Court sentenced one of the men, Nicholas Slatten, to life in prison. The other three, Paul Slough, Dustin Heard and Evan Liberty, were sentenced to 30 years in prison. Mr. Slatten, who was the first to open fire that day, was convicted of murder. His former colleagues were convicted of voluntary manslaughter and of using a machine gun to commit a violent offense.

The sentences represented a victory for the Justice Department, which faced a litany of setbacks and challenges over the years as it struggled to make sense of the events of that day and gather evidence that could be admissible in court.

"What happened on Sept. 16, 2007, was nothing short of an atrocity," T. Patrick Martin, one of the prosecutors who handled the case, said Monday.

The team of F.B.I. agents and federal prosecutors who oversaw the case should be commended for their perseverance. In 2009, a judge dismissed the initial set of charges filed against five Blackwater guards because the case had relied on affidavits the men submitted shortly after the massacre, having been promised immunity. That could have ended the legal proceeding. But prosecutors managed to build a case in 14 of the deaths relying on the testimony of Iraqi witnesses and former Blackwater guards, including one who pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter and has yet to be sentenced.

The Nisour Square massacre was among the most abominable abuses committed by Americans during the Iraq war. Shortly after the shooting, the company changed its name to Xe Services, as though a new brand could wash away its blood-soaked past. The State Department continued doing business with the company, which provided security to American diplomats and intelligence personnel and had won more than $1 billion in government contracts.

The abusive conduct of many Blackwater guards, and the sense that Washington condoned it, fueled the notion that Americans regarded Iraqis as dispensable. That view became widespread, lending legitimacy to Sunni and Shiite extremist groups that killed and maimed thousands of American troops.

The legacy of the United States' war in Iraq will be forever tarnished by the haunting images of torture at Abu Ghraib prison that emerged in 2003 and the massacre of civilians in Haditha by American Marines in 2005. By bringing some of the Blackwater gunmen to justice, the American government has taken an important, if belated, step toward making amends.

13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Contributing Op-Ed Writer: Günter Grass’s Germany, and Mine

FOR years I was frustrated, and a bit embarrassed, to admit that I didn't much like the work of Günter Grass, the Nobel Prize-winning author who died Monday. He was, after all, Germany's most acclaimed writer of the postwar era — not just our national poet, but for many Germans, our conscience. Yet he did not speak to me.

His novel "Crabwalk," published in 2002, was the first book I felt I didn't have to finish. I was angry with myself. I took pride in finishing every book I started, and here was a novel I should have found impossible not to like: It dealt with memory, and the Nazis; it used the metaphor of the crab's gait to show how Germans had to go backward to turn forward, not only with regard to what they had done as Nazis but also what the war had done to those who weren't Nazis — and to their children, to people like me.

Yet his work didn't work on me. The best explanation I could give myself back then for giving up on him was that I simply didn't like his style.

Photo Günter Grass Credit Michael Gottschalk/Photothek, via Getty Images

I was able to pinpoint my frustration only when I met Mr. Grass in person. A couple of months ago he came from his home in Lübeck, on the Baltic coast, to visit my newspaper's office in nearby Hamburg. The conference room was packed: Everyone — editors, assistants, interns — all crowded in to see this living legend. Although I'm sure I wasn't the only one with mixed emotions about the man, the atmosphere was one of near complete adoration. It was the kind of secular worship that I expect no younger author will ever experience, even if he or she wins a Nobel.

Dressed in a red wool sweater and a thick tweed jacket and sipping white wine, Mr. Grass spent most of the time talking about himself, and how much his work as a public intellectual had influenced our paper, Die Zeit. The longer he spoke, the more clearly I felt what had always made me uneasy about him. And not just him, but the entire class of older left-wing German intellectuals that he represented.

Your generation has had it pretty easy, I wanted to blurt out. You grew big in times when strong ideology and determined judgment counted more than the hard work of examining what is actually going on around us. The way you saw the world counted more than the way it actually was. And there was always a lot of self in your righteousness.

Today we know that ideologies aren't realities. Writers and intellectuals don't have that crutch; what is demanded of them, in the first place, is not moral judgment, but clearheaded analysis of our ever-accelerating world. Only in your time, Günter Grass, could you become a moral authority. Today, you would never make it.

I wanted to say all of this, in front of my enraptured colleagues. But I didn't dare.

Someone once said that the days in which politicians decided the fate of entire nations over a glass of whiskey are gone. But so are the days when writers could sit down and divide the world into good and evil through the haze of a tobacco pipe, as Mr. Grass and other members of Gruppe 47, a writers' group formed to renew German literature, did so famously in the 1950s and '60s.

To say that this is a healthy development does not mean to slight their achievement. World War II left Germany without a moral compass; writers like Mr. Grass, Heinrich Böll and Siegfried Lenz provided it. The country needed intellectual leaders who epitomized certainty, however vain they came across.

There are times when moral rigor is needed, but they pass. And yet Mr. Grass was never able to move beyond them. Worse, he seemed to believe that, as the nation's conscience, the rules he applied to others didn't apply to him.

In 2006 he revealed, just before the release of his much-awaited memoir, that he had been a member of the Waffen-SS, the most murderous branch of the Nazi war machine. He maintained that he never fired a shot himself, but nevertheless his confession had a disturbing anticipation of impunity to it. Did Mr. Grass believe that being declared Germany's most important contemporary writer outweighed the fact that he had been active in one of the worst Nazi organizations?

He seemed to take his moral superiority for granted, even as he drifted farther from the mainstream. In 2012 he didn't just publish a poem — "What Must Be Said" — accusing Israel of endangering world peace; he seemed to believe he spoke for all of Germany when he did.

He took the same tone at our meeting in Hamburg, when he accused the European Union and NATO of provoking war with Russia. Sitting face to face with Mr. Grass, I decided to clothe my unease in a question. Did he not think that a war was already going on, sparked by an illegal Russian invasion of Ukraine?

Mr. Grass didn't answer. Instead, he made some broader remarks on Russia and the West. But there was no reason to be disappointed. I felt, clearly, that I came from a different Germany. And that it was all right if he had the impression that I had not spoken to him at all.

13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Taking Note: What Equal Pay Day Says About Working Men

Photo  Credit Jim Young/Reuters

An editorial published today in the Times points out that women are typically paid much less than men, no matter their occupation, career attainment or level of education.

The occasion for the editorial is Equal Pay Day — April 14 — the day when working women pause to consider how many more days, weeks, and months they have to work in any given year to make as much as men made in the prior year. Typically, a woman working full time earns about 78 cents for every dollar earned by her male counterparts, not much better than the 74 cents per dollar she earned in 2000 or the 72 cents she earned in 1990.

And now, for more bad news: The main reason that the gender pay gap has narrowed at all over the past decades is that wages for most men have stagnated or declined.

Paying women less than men is a problem in and of itself, and smacks of discrimination in a way that the erosion in men's wages does not. But it is also a symptom of a larger problem, in which businesses have pursued profits by squeezing pay across the board.

Women have borne the brunt of the process. Men in female-dominated professions — like nursing, teaching, customer service and retail sales — typically make more than women in those jobs. But women in male-dominated professions — from chief executives, general managers and software developers to cooks, carpenters and security guards — do not typically make more than men in those jobs.

To achieve parity, the pay of women would have to grow at a faster rate than the pay of men. The overarching fact of the matter, however, is that laws and norms to support decent starting wages, steady raises and profit sharing have been badly diminished over recent decades — along with equal-pay protections — to the detriment of both women and men.


13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Editorial: A Reckless Act in the Senate on Iran

Photo Senators Bob Corker, left, and Ben Cardin, the leaders of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Credit Win McNamee/Getty Images

Congress has formally muscled its way into President Obama's negotiations with Iran, creating new and potentially dangerous uncertainties for an agreement that offers the best chance of restraining that country's nuclear program.

With a unanimous vote on Tuesday, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved a bill that would require Congress to review, and then vote on, the final text of a nuclear deal. It would also prohibit Mr. Obama from waiving economic sanctions on Iran — the crucial element of any agreement under which Iran rolls back its nuclear program — for at least 30 days, and up to 52 days, after signing an agreement so Congress has time to weigh in.

The full Senate and the House will have to approve the bill. But the committee's action gives momentum to those who have bitterly criticized Mr. Obama for negotiating with Iran, though they offer no credible alternative to the preliminary deal on the table. Republicans who control Congress have largely been the driving force behind the legislation, but this bill was passed overwhelmingly by the Senate committee thanks to Democratic support.

Mr. Obama initially threatened to veto the legislation, but he backed off rather than face a bipartisan override of his veto. The administration did get some compromises. The review period was shortened, and language making the lifting of sanctions dependent on Iran ending support for terrorism was softened.

Mr. Obama's acquiescence might be a tactical move. He could veto the congressional vote on the final agreement, which is supposed to be concluded by the June 30 deadline, rather than expending political capital in vetoing this measure if it were to pass both chambers of Congress. But the Senate committee's action puts him in an weakened position as the only leader involved in the negotiations who may not be permitted to fully honor commitments that were made.

The nuclear deal is the product of a multinational negotiation with Iran conducted by the United States, France, Britain, China, Germany and Russia. In no other country has a legislative body demanded the right to block the agreement. Even if Congress barred Mr. Obama from waiving American sanctions, the European Union and the United Nations Security Council could lift the sanctions they imposed, thus undercutting the American decision.

The United States and Iran have been bitter adversaries since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The Senate committee's vote will heighten Iranian suspicions and complicate the final stretch of arduous negotiations that are scheduled to resume next week.

Several senators insisted that a vote on the final deal was needed so Congress could fulfill its constitutional duties. But there is no constitutional imperative requiring Congress to insert itself into the negotiations, which are the only effective means to block Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Any final agreement would be a political agreement, which Obama administration officials say does not require congressional action, and it would not be a legally binding document. It would not be a formal treaty, which requires Senate ratification.

Every president has negotiated similar agreements as part of executive authority. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee has wrongly and inappropriately diminished the president's power to conduct the nation's foreign policy as he was elected to do.

13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Room for Debate: A Changing World Order?

Written By Unknown on Selasa, 07 April 2015 | 13.25

Introduction

Asian Infrastructure Investment BankFinance Minister Lou Jiwei of China, right, toasts the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank at its signing ceremony in Beijing on Oct. 24, 2014. Takaki Yajima/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Last week, Australia became the latest American ally to join the China-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, reversing an earlier rejection of membership that was made under pressure from the United States. Britain, France, Germany, Italy, South Korea, Russia and Brazil have also rejected U.S. opposition to join the bank.

What effect will the creation of this bank have on the world economy and world politics?

Read the Discussion »
13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Room for Debate: Is Yemen America's Fight?

Written By Unknown on Jumat, 03 April 2015 | 13.25

The United States, Saudis and Yemeni leaders have coordinated airstrikes on Al Qaeda targets in Yemen for years. But when another foe of Al Qaeda, Houthi militias, allied with Iran, swept the Yemeni government out of power, the Saudis organized a military operation against them with fellow Sunni Arab nations. The United States has backed its Saudi allies with logistical and intelligence support. But could that only make the region more unstable and cost more civilian lives?

Should the United States avoid getting involved — even indirectly — in regional military efforts to fight the Houthis in Yemen?

Read the Discussion »
13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Room for Debate: Is Yemen America's Fight?

Written By Unknown on Kamis, 02 April 2015 | 13.25

The United States, Saudis and Yemeni leaders have coordinated airstrikes on Al Qaeda targets in Yemen for years. But when another foe of Al Qaeda, Houthi militias, allied with Iran, swept the Yemeni government out of power, the Saudis organized a military operation against them with fellow Sunni Arab nations. The United States has backed its Saudi allies with logistical and intelligence support. But could that only make the region more unstable and cost more civilian lives?

Should the United States avoid getting involved — even indirectly — in regional military efforts to fight the Houthis in Yemen?

Read the Discussion »
13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

Room for Debate: The Pulpit and the Ballot Box

Written By Unknown on Rabu, 25 Maret 2015 | 13.25

  • Randy Boyagoda

    Caring in All the Wrong Ways

    Randy Boyagoda, author, "Richard John Neuhaus"

    The identity politicking God talk crowds out a a more substantive involvement of religion in debates about public policy and the future direction of the nation.

  • Colleen Carroll Campbell

    Insight Into a Candidate's Worldveiw

    Colleen Carroll Campbell, author "My Sisters the Saints"

    The real question voters should be asking when they ponder a politician's faith: Does he actually mean it? Does it influence her public and private choices?

  • Yehudah Mirsky

    An 'American Religion' Transcends Sectarianism

    Yehudah Mirsky, Theologian and rabbi

    The foundation of our civic life lies in our adherence to universal moral truths because of individual conscience and communal affiliation.

  • Anthea Butler

    Religious Groups Encourage Religious Campaigns

    Anthea Butler, Professor of religious studies

    Iowa's Republican caucus season resembles a revival more than a campaign because of the power of conservative Christian organizations.

  • Penn Jillette

    Have Faith, We'll Have an Atheist President

    Penn Jillette, author, "God, No!"

    Some day there will be a candidate America loves, and the fact that she or he is atheist will matter as much as Kennedy being Catholic.

  • Michael Novak

    Religious Convictions Are Deep and Abiding

    Michael Novak, theologian

    Like it or not, Americans have always been concerned about freedom of religion, and scrutinized campaigning politicians carefully. They should.


  • 13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Paying for Workers' Training

    Written By Unknown on Jumat, 20 Maret 2015 | 13.25

    A recent article about the demand for welders in Texas and the Gulf Coast region highlighted a growing partnership between the energy industry and community colleges. As the economy still struggles, and a so-called skills gap persists, who should pay for workers' training?

    Read the Discussion »
    13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: If a Woman's Place Is on the 20

    Written By Unknown on Kamis, 19 Maret 2015 | 13.25

    Introduction

    rfdtwentyJoe Mortis

    A campaign has begun to put a woman on the $20 bill by 2020, the 100th anniversary of women gaining the right to vote in the United States.

    Who better to make room for a new honoree than the current resident, Andrew Jackson? Even if you don't think he's a genocidal racist, he opposed paper currency. So if we wave bye-bye to Jackson, what woman should we welcome?

    Read the Discussion »
    13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Deciding an Institution's Future

    Written By Unknown on Selasa, 17 Maret 2015 | 13.25

    Without congressional reauthorization, the Export-Import Bank, which guarantees loans to the overseas customers of thousands of American companies, is slated to close this summer. The future of the institution is driving a wedge between free-market and pro-business Republican lawmakers.

    Should Congress save the Export-Import Bank, or let it expire?

    Read the Discussion »
    13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: What Happens as More States Curtail Labor's Rights?

    Written By Unknown on Jumat, 13 Maret 2015 | 13.25

  • Richard Vedder

    Income Rises When These Laws Are Passed

    Richard Vedder, Economics professor

    Capital moves to right-to-work states with a more stable labor environment, and that increases labor demand and, ultimately, income and wages.

  • Elise Gould

    Wages Are Lower in States With These Laws

    Elise Gould, Economic Policy Institute

    Unions bargain for better wages and benefits, and workers in "right-to-work" states have lower wages and fewer benefits.

  • Scott Manley

    A Key to Economic Growth

    Scott Manley, Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce

    Business leaders say that they look for "right to work" states when they're seeking a place to locate or expand.

  • George Gresham

    Call It 'Right-to-Work-for-Less'

    George Gresham, 1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East

    Its aim is to deprive unions of dues money essential to their ability to represent workers and enforce contracts.

  • Barry Hirsch

    Both Sides Exaggerate Its Effects

    Barry Hirsch, economics professor

    It can strengthen unions by forcing them to be responsive to workers. And they might not encourage growth as much as supporters say.


  • 13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Are Same-Sex Colleges Still Relevant?

    Written By Unknown on Rabu, 11 Maret 2015 | 13.25

    Last week, the board of Sweet Briar College, an all-women's school in Virginia, announced that it would be permanently shuttered in August due to "insurmountable financial challenges." The school's president, James Jones, Jr., attributed the close, in part, to the declining number of "young women willing to consider a single-sex education."

    Is there still a place for same-sex colleges? Do they play an important role in education, or are they outdated?

    Read the Discussion »
    13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: When the Elephants Exit the Big Top

    Written By Unknown on Selasa, 10 Maret 2015 | 13.25

  • Katherine Applegate

    Now Let the Tigers and Camels Go, Too

    Katherine Applegate, author, "The One and Only Ivan"

    When I was a child, going to a circus with wild animal acts was a rite of passage. These days, it's an act of complicit cruelty.

  • Grey Stafford

    This Is Not a Victory for All Elephants

    Grey Stafford, zoo animal trainer

    A picture in a book or a video doesn't begin to have the same lasting impact on a person as experiencing a real, living creature.

  • Virginia Morell

    Take Your Kids to an Elephant Sanctuary!

    Virginia Morell, author, "Animal Wise"

    What does dressing up elephants as if they are show-girls and making them perform tricks teach our children?

  • Dominique Jando

    Traveling Circuses Are Easy Targets

    Dominique Jando, circus historian

    PETA and politicians trying to win votes and praise have blindly and unfairly attacked circuses in a way that has become hurtful to the industry and the performers.


  • 13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Digital Friendships

    Written By Unknown on Jumat, 06 Maret 2015 | 13.25

  • Jazmine Hughes

    It Can Make Real Life Friendships Easier

    Jazmine Hughes, editor, The Hairpin

    Online, you can choose to opt in — friend, follow, favorite — any person that piques your interest, because of what you can find out about their interests.

  • Sherry Turkle

    Face-to-Face Friendship Is Important

    Sherry Turkle, author, "Alone Together"

    An in-person exchange cultivates empathy because you are able to experience the whole person and the way they respond to you.

  • Alice Marwick

    Increased Social Support, Even Online, Is Beneficial

    Alice Marwick, author, "Status Update"

    Most of us fluidly move between on- and off-line social contexts, and so do our friendships.

  • Nicholas Carr

    Projecting Onto the Screen

    Nicholas Carr, author, "The Glass Cage"

    The anxiety that virtual friends feel when they're about to meet in person is telling.

  • Katherine Hertlein

    Does Easier Intimacy Lead to Easier Infidelity?

    Katherine Hertlein, professor, Marriage and Family Therapy

    Online anonymity permits risks we'd usually avoid. People think this does not make them unfaithful, because there was no actual meeting.


  • 13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: What Makes a Good Teacher

    Written By Unknown on Rabu, 04 Maret 2015 | 13.26

    Gov. Andrew Cuomo has proposed major changes to teacher evaluations in New York. The changes emphasize student scores on standardized tests as a way to rate a teacher's performance. It is a trend that is popping up across the country, raising concerns among teachers, administrators and public school parents, some of whom are refusing to let their children take the exams.

    If this approach is not the way to go and yet American students are still academically behind their peers in other countries, how do we ensure and improve teacher quality such that student success is a given?

    Read the Discussion »
    13.26 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Can a Genetic Test Be Anonymous?

    Written By Unknown on Selasa, 03 Maret 2015 | 13.25

    The F.D.A. has allowed 23andMe to market genetic tests for mutations directly to the public. The agency said that, for the most part, so-called carrier tests would no longer need advance approval before being marketed this way. But 23andMe is also offering access to its data for research, opening up questions about privacy and anonymity.

    Should commercial companies share genetic information for research purposes? Is it an invasion of privacy or is the potential for scientific breakthrough more important?

    Read the Discussion »
    13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Would We Be Safer if Fewer Were Jailed?

    Written By Unknown on Jumat, 27 Februari 2015 | 13.25

  • Julia M. Stasch

    Keep Out of Jail Those Who Don't Need to Be There

    Julia M. Stasch, MacArthur Foundation

    Jail is now for those who can't afford bail. Programs can provide services to end unnecessary jail stays and strengthen public safety.

  • Nicholas Turner

    Stop Placing the Mentally Ill in Jails

    Nicholas Turner, Vera Institute of Justice

    Divert those with mental health problems from jail, where their conditions are worsened by abuse, medical neglect and solitary confinement.

  • Kent Scheidegger

    Local Jails Are an Important Part of the Penal System

    Kent Scheidegger, Criminal Justice Legal Foundation

    At the low end are the alternatives to incarceration, at the upper end is state prison, and county jail is in the crucial middle.

  • Marc A. Levin

    Reducing Inmates Can Reduce Crime

    Marc A. Levin, Right on Crime

    Incarceration can lead to more incarceration. Courts must use actuarial risk assessments to determine who should be released pretrial.

  • Glenn E. Martin

    Make Justice Jails' Prime Purpose

    Glenn E. Martin, JustLeadershipUSA

    Jails have become the easy solution for the problems of addiction, poverty, mental illness, rather than instruments of justice.

  • Malcolm M. Feeley

    Solutions Can Have Unintended Consequences

    Malcolm M. Feeley, law professor

    Violating a condition of pretrial release may be treated more seriously than the initial charge.


  • 13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Is Home Birth Ever a Safe Choice?

    Written By Unknown on Rabu, 25 Februari 2015 | 13.25

  • Tekoa King

    When Risks Are Low, A Safe Choice

    Tekoa King, Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health

    In Britain, women are actually advised to have children at home or in a birth center, rather than a hospital, when the pregnancy is low-risk.

  • Amos GrunebaumFrank Chervenak

    Home Birth Is Not Safe

    Amos Grunebaum and Frank Chervenak, NewYork-Presbyterian

    In the United States, those who support home birth as safe are propagating junk science.

  • Aaron Caughey

    What Risk Is Acceptable?

    Aaron Caughey, Oregon Health and Science University

    As long as women know the risks and benefits of location of birth, hopefully they are able to make a decision that reflects their preferences.

  • Aja Graydon

    My Experience with Home Birth

    Aja Graydon, musician

    The first time was motivated by the practicality of it: I was self-employed and without health insurance at the time.

  • John Jennings

    Emergency Care Can Be Too Urgent for Home Births

    John Jennings, American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

    The ability of a physician to rapidly provide care can be the difference between life or death for both mother and baby.

  • Marinah Valenzuela Farrell

    Hospitals Carry Their Own Risks

    Marinah Valenzuela Farrell, Midwives Alliance of North America

    Certified professional midwives and certified nurse midwives should be licensed to practice independently in all 50 states.


  • 13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Terror and the Palestinian Authority

    A federal jury in Manhattan ruled on Monday that the Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organization must pay $655.5 million for supporting six attacks in Israel that killed and injured Americans. The verdict, if upheld, could damage the Palestinian government, financially and politically.

    What does the ruling mean for the future of the Palestinian Authority?

    Read the Discussion »
    13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Homes for the Homeless

    Written By Unknown on Jumat, 20 Februari 2015 | 13.25

  • Howard Husock

    Offering Housing Could Increase Demand for It

    Howard Husock, Manhattan Institute

    Government support for single-parent families risk discouraging them from taking steps to improve their long-term economic condition.

  • Rosanne Haggerty

    For Even the Neediest, Housing Is the Solution

    Rosanne Haggerty, Community Solutions

    We found that even people with mental illness and addictions could remain in housing with the right combination of supportive services.

  • Sam Tsemberis

    It's Fiscally Sensible and the Right Thing to Do

    Sam Tsemberis, Pathways to Housing

    Our approach to homelessness stems from archaic beliefs that the poor lack moral character, when, in fact, they are simply lacking cash.

  • Kevin Corinth

    More Complex Solutions Are Needed

    Kevin Corinth, American Enterprise Institute

    The Housing First philosophy threatens to distract us from the solutions that would most effectively address these other important needs.

  • Jaron Benjamin

    Supportive Housing Could End the AIDS Epidemic

    Jaron Benjamin, Housing Works

    Housing could reduce H.I.V. mortality by as much as 80 percent and decrease the rate of new infections.

  • William Burnett

    Ask the Homeless What They Need

    William Burnett, Picture the Homeless

    Homeless people have been at the receiving end of broken policies and economic dogmas, and have had no agency in sculpting them.


  • 13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Is Network News Dead?

    Written By Unknown on Rabu, 18 Februari 2015 | 13.25

  • Ray Suarez

    Reports of Its Death Have Been Greatly Exaggerated

    Ray Suarez, Al Jazeera America

    Because of their size, reach, resources and agenda-setting power, networks and their news departments still matter.

  • Michael Rosenblum

    TV News Producers Are Everywhere Now

    Michael Rosenblum, TV news consultant

    With 100 hours of video uploaded each minute to Youtube, spending hundreds of millions of dollars on a half-hour program is idiotic.

  • Joe Peyronnin

    Its Relevance Will Evolve, Not Disappear

    Joe Peyronnin, Former network news executive

    Network news divisions are still profitable, and evening newscasts are more widely viewed than cable news.

  • Elayne Rapping

    An Audience Ages, Turns Away and Gets Jaded

    Elayne Rapping, professor emerita, SUNY Buffalo

    By turning to infotainment, with less serious news focusing on human interest, and personality anchors, things became worse.

  • Shelley Ross

    Vanquishing Their Own Worst Enemy

    Shelley Ross, Former network producer

    Newsrooms can be populated with those who actually insist on producing more than a photo op for an anchor photo.

  • Cenk Uygur

    Blandness Will Succumb to Passion

    Cenk Uygur, TYTnetwork

    Being serious was once rewarded. Now, it's a sign of dishonesty – you've been covering the news for years and have no opinion on it?


  • 13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: How Should a Person Handle Heartbreak?

    Written By Unknown on Jumat, 13 Februari 2015 | 13.25

    In honor of Valentine's Day, we asked for advice on that particular form of misery that touches most every person — heartbreak. Let us know what you think, and if you have any recommendations of your own, in the comments, on Facebook or on Twitter.

    How should a person handle heartbreak?

    Read the Discussion »
    13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Deadlier Ties to Ukraine?

    Written By Unknown on Kamis, 12 Februari 2015 | 13.25

    Prompted in part by disagreements between the United States and its NATO allies on whether to provide arms to Ukraine, the leaders of France, Germany, Russia and Ukraine, met in Minsk, Belarus, on Wednesday to negotiate a peace agreement for Ukraine and end the conflict there. Earlier in the week — amid growing calls from Congress — President Obama said he would not rule out sending lethal aid to Ukraine.

    If negotiations go sour, should the U.S. provide Kiev with lethal aid to fight Russian-backed rebels?

    Read the Discussion »
    13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: You Must Be 21 to Drink?

    Written By Unknown on Rabu, 11 Februari 2015 | 13.25

    In an effort to address student misconduct, the president of Dartmouth College in Hanover, N.H., announced last month that hard alcohol would be banned on campus. But many critics found the announcement bizarre, since at least half of college age kids are underage. And singling out hard liquor seemed like an ineffective solution to bad behavior.

    Is there a better way to deal with underage drinking? Should the drinking age, perhaps, be lowered?

    Read the Discussion »
    13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Does Helping Condo Developers Hurt the City?

    A New York Times' series on the foreign purchase of high-end condos in New York City noted that the number of residences costing over $5 million has more than tripled in the past decade. While tax breaks to encourage condo developments cost a half-billion dollars a year, some say they fuel those exorbitant prices, raising housing prices in general.

    Have tax breaks, zoning and other policies that have fueled condo development unfairly benefited the rich at the expense of other residents?

    Read the Discussion »
    13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More

    Room for Debate: Are Economists Overrated?

    Written By Unknown on Selasa, 10 Februari 2015 | 13.25

  • Diane Coyle

    The Pie on the Table, Not in the Sky

    Diane Coyle, University of Manchester, England

    Government decisions balance costs and benefits, winners and losers. It is best to do this explicitly, which is what economists do.

  • Orlando PattersonEthan Fosse

    Don't Rely on Pseudo-Science

    Orlando Patterson and Ethan Fosse, Harvard University

    Implementation of mainstream economic ideas has led to massive failures after expertise of other academics were ignored.

  • Peter Blair Henry

    Analyze and Explain, Don't Prognosticate

    Peter Blair Henry, New York University

    Economics succeeds when used as a forensic tool, employing history and data, not creating unrealistic expectations.

  • Philip N. Cohen

    Exceptions Overwhelm Economic Rules

    Philip N. Cohen, University of Maryland

    Exploitation, dishonesty, violence, ignorance and demagoguery set vast areas of social life apart outside of economic models.

  • Marion Fourcade

    An Ambivalent Authority

    Marion Fourcade, University of California, Berkeley

    Much of economic science is esoteric and preoccupied with internal struggles. Ideological divisions, exploited by politicians, defy clarity.

  • Charles R. Plott

    Failures Shouldn't Obscure Widespread Success

    Charles R. Plott, California Institute of Technology

    Economic science is the foundation of sound policies and techniques in business and government.


  • 13.25 | 0 komentar | Read More
    techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger